The Truth About Aloha

Are you guys saying that memes are bad?

I didn’t really want to comment on this, and most staff probably won’t, but I got dragged into this mess, so let’s just get this over with. I’ll try to be as concise as possible while addressing the actual points, but still thorough, as to not be accused of… well, hopefully, anything at all. most of you probably know by now that I don’t partake in the community a great deal, so hopefully you can take this as an unbiased response.

also, while I can’t believe I even have to say it, I’ll say it anyways; these are my opinions, and this is my response. it is not to be interpreted as representative the staff as a whole. (even though it might be worded that way… vOv)

this is sadly true, though from my point of view of one as the people that wants to “cling” to Ace of Spades, it isn’t that it’s not AoS, but a number of other factors such as how easy it is to transition over to the new game, server hosting difficulties, the community of the game in question and a few other things. I realize this is just an exaggerated statement to get a point across, but I wanted to address it anyways, so there you have it.
(the rest of the paragraph was obvious to everyone so I cut it out)

I’ll agree with the somewhat vague statement “guards are getting beaten up” as it’s so vague, and because I agree (mostly) with israelleelll.
as for the rest, evidence, please. you’re leaking info now anyways (more on that later), so naming some names and sharing some stories probably won’t hurt. at the very least you can give the people involved a chance to defend themselves.

I went through all of the trusted apps and staff apps and I can’t find a single piece of evidence for this “they” calling on others to trash applications. …or did you specifically mean Komrades?
we might bring up old issues, but just remember, the application system is run by humans, not machines. you have to work to gain our trust, and if you break that, you’re going have to work even harder to get it back. even with that in mind, the people involved almost always handle things fairly, if things are shown to be different the next time around.

can you really blame us? unless you are insane, you wouldn’t let any one come into a position of power (yes, trusted counts) unless you knew them to be a good person, who wouldn’t abuse it. this is just common sense, man.
as for the “going after someone” part, I have to disagree on the larger scale. there might be one or two instances where this happened, as we’re all human after all, but the application system as a whole is carried out with integrity. if we ask people questions, they’re fair, or at least supposed to be, those ‘instances’ in mind.

so wait, it was “staff are unfairly ganging up and denying apps to everyone equally” and now it’s “staff are unfairly ganging up and denying my application”?
as a side note, that app leaking is a serious thing, and maybe you should be the better man and “report” the person who did that. or was it one of the Bastards, and you’re too nice to do that to a friend?

I’m not sure why we have to ban people for that in the first place, we don’t ban them for that ingame. or do you want to censor both at the same time? I’m afraid I can’t get behind that.

evidence please. I’m not going to accept claims without evidence. I also have a sneaking suspicion this was a one-time thing.
but I’ll humor you this once, and assuming this is true, that’s pretty terrible, and should obviously be stopped. if you go through my ban appeal history, you might notice that after a few ban appeals I get fed up with their act and stop responding altogether. I’m pretty sure most other admins do this too, so I’m not really some huge role model.

we have rules, though. they’re just not as strict as you’d like them to be. no cheating (glitching, hacks), no spamming, no overly racist/sexist/etc stuff. the last one is more subjective than the others, but as a general rule it’s a pretty high set bar, as most of the staff have high tolerances for that type of stuff. on top of that, the etc stuff is usually ironic/sarcastic anyways.
also, would overhaul = removing Komrades? because most of the staff seem pretty ok to me…

I’ve numbered the points so I don’t put any more quotes than necessary.

  1. guards are staff too, so I’m not sure why you’re upset about that. we don’t get upset at guards for being ambitious, what are you talking about? we actually want that.
  2. neither do we, honestly. but more on the point: that’s true, but we restrict ip range banning because of the possibility of abuse. this makes a tiny bit less sense nowadays due to the slower rate of promotion, but I still agree with it.
  3. I never had this as a guard, this sounds like a “you” problem.
  4. I suppose I can agree with that, but how and why are non-retired semi-inactive staff relevant to this?
  5. good exaggeration, I like it. why don’t you provide some examples for us?
  6. perhaps with MW but you can just message us directly if we don’t see it, and we’ll definitely respond to that, so… I don’t see the problem here.
  7. sorry to burst your bubble, but unless you’re a really close friend with someone over the internet, or they know you IRL or something, they won’t care either. it’s not a fault of the staff. it’s not even truly a fault.

MW has become less useful over time, I will say that much. again it might be a good idea to message more active admins about the reports.
am I counted in as one of the “higher staff”?

  1. I’m in the staff channel, obviously, so… uh… no?
  2. “Komrades” ding ding ding we have a winner. they’re actually fair and levelheaded people, you know.
  3. now it’s “rigging” the apps? jesus.
  4. covered this
  5. yes, the staff have moved to other places, and are more busy IRL. is this really that surprising?
  6. that sucks. covered this though.
  7. good job, speaking for all of the staff. I don’t view guards as expendable, and I’m pretty sure none of us do.
  8. evidence please
  9. same as the response to 5. it’s disappointing, but unless we can find some way to get people back in this community there’s nothing we can really do about this.
  10. do not deal in absolutes!! meh, you might be right. this seems like a good game though: Teeworlds

sorry, I’m lost. helped you build what?

I’m not frustrated much at all, so please speak for yourself. also, I don’t see any reform happening. sorry.

this might be a bit of a dark turn, and an unpopular opinion, but the staff have every right to delete this thread and ban you, as we make the rules. you don’t have any rights here, we’re letting you voice this. it’s a good thing for everyone involved here that most of the staff believe fully in free speech. (and in case it wasn’t clear, I do too)
also, you’re simply wrong here. this is a leak. or, it would be, if a lot of this wasn’t inaccurate. most, if not all of the people in this thread have no access to that staff document, so good job.

so, as member of the “good staff,” can I argue against this? or is my “good staff” membership now revoked? a lot of this stuff you’ve posted is exaggerated tales and extraordinary claims.
evidence please. this is not how arguments work, you have the burden of proof. those who make extraordinary claims must provide extraordinary evidence.

you’d better be.

less important stuff

why isn’t topo on that list? :frowning:

as for israelleelll’s post, I can agree with most of that, as sad as it is. though the post is a bit… extreme.

p.s. wow this is a big post.
p.p.s. a lot of this stuff should really be privately discussed, look what you did :slight_smile:

i actually find it funny to read such dramatic posts
also muffintastic is a full of common sense person and it just feels right reading his answer

shoutout to the og homies o7  8) 8) 8)


I did not read Muffin’s post becuase it was too long.

Same

  • dd

Actually some memes are bad and nsfw.Half of the memes are used to reflect peoples wrongdoings and failures to kind of emberass them:
Example:Trump threatens to destroy ISIS
Too scared to speak in Chicago.

i saw this meme on google.

No doubt, yes

1 like for ya @Muffingastric

Click for details

8) 8) 8)

@OP, your banned admin has been contact

ty

ps. shoutout to the bad staff

I never had problems with anyone. Thank you for maintaining this platform.

This is from from yesterday and today. Mind you, these are not all bans. Some of these videos are short clips of someone I thought was suspicious, some of these videos are evidence broken in to parts, but the bulk of this is evidence that was followed up with a ban. If I don’t upload this every time i ban someone it won’t stick for more than 6 hours. If i don’t upload this I’ll never be promoted above guard. If i upload this I may as well call this a full time job with a volunteers salary.

Ignoring the claims of admin abuse and corruption, our system is broken.


#FixAloha

#AlsoFixBnS

wow

Changes are starting to take place, if you have noticed. It took a long time but now things are finally going to be straightened out it seems. There is now a new BK, but more importantly, the Anonymous section is gone. This will eliminate a lot of forum trolling, flaming and bullying, and I doubt that feature will return ever. This is a step in the right direction. Let’s see if any new game servers pop up.

I normally don’t double post but I just realized there has been a rather large misconception.

When I said people well, work together to tank applications, I don’t think I mentioned exactly HOW. I don’t really mean on the level where people get together in like, a chatroom or voice chat and discuss who to fk up. I mean, afaik, that might have happened once or twice. What I meant was that inactives can be called in to vote. While inactives may be veterans, it’s definitely annoying because they carry with them sometimes very VERY old opinions, and won’t hesitate to recall them. While knowing something has happened is good, some people completely can be swayed by old opinions that may not reflect current events, actions or attitude, which in essence is asking around for people to tank applications. It happened to me, in my last application, and some people actually called the inactives out on it.

On a different note, say you do change and come back after a period of absence. Chances are there will still be a few assholes, who want to toss wood into the fire. Treating someone like they used to behave when they’re obviously trying hard to be different is definitely a dick move, and demoralizing. Fact: FerrariFlunker had a pretty rough time climbing up from being permabanned because of his past actions, but he eventually became a pillar of the community for a while. However, that doesn’t always happen. For example AceTheKing kept being bullied and eventually the constant bullying made him do bad things because people wouldn’t shut up and leave him alone about how he used to act, and it pushed him into being a complete asshole. I’ve seen people act very immature and pin the immaturity on someone else when they retaliate.

all you whine much; relax, friends adn ppl of the night :slight_smile: ::slight_smile: it okay!

lol.

haha. lets kill torch for all the things

Old habits die, they said.
AoS is a habit, so probably that counts…?

(Atreyu I see you liked Anon’s post, he’s not laughing at me, but moreso at the responses to the topic, especially Torch’s bc well, Torch had some nice drama. Same with Pun’s response. In reference to Torch.)
Well I lost my trusted status for leaking “insider information”. If that isn’t enough to prove that there are things true in this topic, I don’t really know what else to say. In all honesty it’s whistleblowing (which well, in response to Nathan, is actually legal in my country) because I am exposing major flaws and attempting to get things fixed instead of well, fucking them up more. People were so quick to jump to the conclusion I wanted to cause more issues because of my past. No. Grow up and accept that people change. I pointed out issues because I wanted change for the better. I respect izzy’s principles because he pays for this forum, and I tried doing this to try and show izzy that there needed to be change. This forum is dead to enough people already because of issues outlined.

TL;DR, the majority of this topic is true. I wish I could provide picture evidence to everything but the administrative response should be enough to prove that a lot of this is true. I didn’t lose my trusted for “causing problems” or “being a troublemaker”.