On Admins

[Big_Jimmy]

@A White Guy post:16

@Ryu post:15

^^Her*

Him*

Him.

[HoboHob]

@Drebbel post:19

@HoboHob post:13

@Drebbel: Of course it isn’t a case of murder, I was just using an analogy. The point remains the same.

An analogy implies a similarity of some kind, which I fail to see here.
If you like to use an analogy closer by I suggest a game of hide and seek with some friends. For example after a couple of rounds you discover one guy always takes a peek during counting down and he knows exactly where you hide. You think ‘hey that’s not fair’, and you tell him.
You’ll say: ‘come on man, don’t do that’ and he apologizes and promises not to do it again. You pat him on the back and enjoy the rest of the game in the greatest fun. Hurray, everybody happy.

But that is a flawed analogy. This is the Internet, nobody is ‘friends’ and get along nicely.

Again, the point of the banning is to serve as a warning to people considering aimbotting.

Now of course this is just my opinion.

[Ryu]

@CrazyPug

@Ryu post:18

@A White Guy post:16

@Ryu post:15

^^Her*

Nope I never knew that.I considered that Izzy is a girl name so…
Him*

What me dont get??

Izzy is a boy; did you not know that?

[Sniper_MUG]

HEY I JUST JOINED ON ALOHA.PKCOUNTERSTRIKEMAPS AND DISCOVERD THAT GUY HACKER-BR-GAMES HIS ACCURACY AT RIFLE WAS 1181 AND ON SMG 900 !!!

[LightGuy757]

I know I cant ban anyone with out starting a vote kick, but I will not start a vote kick without first observing the suspected party aimbotting. And only at this point will I call for an admin or start a kick. I wish more people would do this, then there probably wouldn’t be as many vote kicks during a game.